[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15 -- was about 2019-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Fri Apr 5 20:59:57 CEST 2019
In message <28F8CA64-F298-4A5B-99D0-411F96C56004 at gmail.com>, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >Come to think of it, Philip and Geoff have been presenting their CIDR report >on aggregation for even longer than that. I haven't seen their list of >prefixes that could do with a ton of aggregation getting any smaller .. Yea. And according to what I see from time to time on bgp.he.net, plenty of entities are still announcing bogons. And according to what I see from time to time on RIPE Routing History, quite a few people are or have been announcing ridiculous routes, like for /2. All in all, not a pretty picture. In fact it all gives the impression of a pretty absurd level of anarchy. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15 -- was about 2019-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]