[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15 -- was about 2019-03
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15 -- was about 2019-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Fri Apr 5 09:23:12 CEST 2019
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 08:32:39PM +0200, Karl-Josef Ziegler wrote: >> Yes, this is also my opinion. The community should do something against >> this abusive behavior. >> If it isn't done by the community there might be some regulation coming >> from outside, i.e. >> political entities. And I doubt that this will be the better way to handle >> this problem. > > I am starting to come around to the opinion that such regulation > would actually be preferrable to this. Legislative regulation, at > least in democratic societies, imposes responsibilities but it > also gives *rights*. Namely constitutionality, the right to have > such regulation applied transparently and fairly and, most > importantly, the right to judicial review. None of which applies > to the vigilante kind of "justice" the proponents wish the RIPE > NCC to become the enforcer of. Given these two choices, I know > which way I'd vote. Hi, So you seem to prefer regulation over self-regulation? And who would be doing that regulation? - some EC org (service region goes way beyond EU...) - the Dutch Telecoms Regulator? - ITU-T? - ...? Honestly, i don't have a clue... Regards, Carlos > rgds, > SL > >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15 -- was about 2019-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]