[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Thu Apr 4 22:58:31 CEST 2019
Hi, On Thu, 4 Apr 2019, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > In message <20190404183631.GZ97529 at Space.Net>, > Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > >> Still targeting the wrong crowd. A few willing Tier1 ISPs would have way >> more effect than all policies we do in RIPE land against a rogue ISP that >> might not even *be* a RIPE member (or a member of any LIR). > > It is a fair point, but it raises an obvious question, which I ask now > in all seriousness, because I really and truly do not know the answer: > > Wny have Tier 1 providers not stepped up and done a much better job > of policing hijacks better than they have done? Not all hijacks reach the so-called DFZ. "Partial visibility" hijacks can happen without touching any of the Tier-1s.... Regards, Carlos > Regards, > rfg >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]