[anti-abuse-wg] New on RIPE Labs: How We Will Be Validating abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New on RIPE Labs: How We Will Be Validating abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Agenda Update AA-WG RIPE 77
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Fri Oct 12 10:02:49 CEST 2018
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:21:44PM +0200, Mirjam Kuehne wrote: > https://labs.ripe.net/Members/angela_dallara/how-we-will-be-validating-abuse-c thanks for designing and sharing this sensible approach. Please allow a few questions (maybe for the WG presentation): o "We will start with a verification tool which checks that there are no formatting errors in the email address, verifies DNS entries, looks for bogus or honeypot emails ... Could you elaborate a bit on the latter two? o "An initial test with the validation tool suggests that around 20-25% of resource holders may need to validate or update their abuse contacts." Understanding that the sentence says "initial test", but mentions "resource holders", is this 20-25% of the 70.000 addresses? Thanks, Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New on RIPE Labs: How We Will Be Validating abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Agenda Update AA-WG RIPE 77
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]