[anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Mar 20 13:54:58 CET 2018
Hi, On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 01:23:18PM +0100, Janos Zsako wrote: > At the same time, I do see some benefit in checking regularly the provided > e-mail address, because I am convinced that there will always be cases where > people simply forget to update the database. If they are reminded, they will > be happy to correct it. This is actually some benefit I see here - the NCC already does the ARC in regular intervals, so including abuse-c: in "please check that these are still correct" would be useful to help "those that do care but overlooked a necessary update". (Right now, the NCC will already ensure that contacts are correct if they receive a complaint from someone that contact data is wrong) So, still not really able to make up my mind whether I support or oppose this - staying neutral. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20180320/e7f96eec/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]