[anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Mon Mar 19 03:22:38 CET 2018
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:43:54 +0000 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: <snip> > I'm not a lawyer, but deal a lot with them, and I'm sure anyway, > there are more informed voices even from the NCC that can confirm, > and actually it will be interesting to confirm. > +1 I would like to also present the other side of the same argument: If the NCC provides a platform that supplies fake/false/wrong information it could also attract arguments of legal liability... Similarly, if the NCC does not provide abuse contact information there could also be legal arguments that this is a dereliction of trust with regards public resource management and that also opens up arguments of liability... So, this would be most interesting to confirm. Regards Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]