[anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02

On 14/03/2018 13:32, Marco Schmidt wrote:
> Please let me reiterate that the RIPE NCC will not activate the
> closure procedure simply for failure to maintain the "abuse-mailbox:"
> attribute.
> 
> The closure procedure could be activated if the resource holder refuses
> to provide correct abuse contact information or is unresponsive over a
> longer period (during which the RIPE NCC will have made several attemps
> to contact the resource holder via different channels).

Marco,

Thank you for your detailed mail. However I do not understand how the
two sentences quoted above are consistent with each other. Is it that
you won't activate the closure procedure *solely* for failure to
maintain abuse-mailbox, but might activate it if this was compounded
with some other breach?

How would you feel if the policy was amended to say something along the
lines of

"For the pupose of RIPE-676 paragraph 1.6.2.1.1 (Violation of RIPE
Policys and RIPE NCC Procedures), failure to maintain the abuse-mailbox
attribute shall not be deemed sufficient reason to terminate the SSA in
itself, but may be deemed an aggravating factor contributing towards a
decision to terminate the SSA."

Kind Regards,

Malcolm.

-- 
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
           Monument Place, 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA