[anti-abuse-wg] When email verification behavior is abusive
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] When email verification behavior is abusive
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] When email verification behavior is abusive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Clayton
richard at highwayman.com
Wed Jul 18 13:45:35 CEST 2018
In message <3C775DA1-20AE-441E-B30E-38243F420D24 at blacknight.com>, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com> writes >What's any of this got to do with RIPE and this WG? the issue of mail bombing ... people getting 20K+ emails in their mailbox, each of which is individually quite acceptable is something which the industry has been struggling with for well over a year >Is there a policy proposal or something else forthcoming? an obvious mitigation is CAPTCHAs on sign-up forms ... so it would be an appropriate Best Practice to document -- but whether RIPE is a suitable forum for such a document (or whether there is somewhere which is far more focused on hosting providers) I could not say. -- richard Richard Clayton Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 185 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20180718/3456ae0d/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] When email verification behavior is abusive
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] When email verification behavior is abusive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]