[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Jan 22 14:19:26 CET 2018
Hi, On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:25:12AM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: > I have no problem with abuse-c validation, either via ARC, or the > mechanism proposed in this policy, and probably not via a range of other > mechanisms either. But threatening to terminate the right of an > organisation to continue to exist in the case of non compliance of the > terms specified in 2017-02 is frankly absurd. I second this concern. I do see the need for a working abuse contact, and I do see the need of sanctions in case a policy is violated, but "deregister all resources, because your mail server was broken when we tested" is too extreme (exaggeration for emphasis). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20180122/89fb2ca8/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]