[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Hungenberg
th at cert-bund.de
Fri Jan 19 16:44:45 CET 2018
On 19.01.2018 13:08, Marco Schmidt wrote: > The way that abuse reports are handled by the receiving party is > usually defined by the internal procedures of the providers and not by RIPE > Policies. If the abuse-mailbox is valid but the resource holder constantly ignores abuse complaints sent to this mailbox for a longer time (no response, no action taken, phishing sites or botnet c2s etc. not taken down) - what is the process to escalate this (probably finally leading to the resource being withdrawn)? - Thomas CERT-Bund Incident Response & Malware Analysis Team
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]