[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arash Naderpour
arash.naderpour at gmail.com
Fri Jan 19 10:28:43 CET 2018
Hi Jordi, A period of 48 hours looks too short to me, I suggest something like within a period of 2 working days (or even more). Regards, Arash On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:44 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg < anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > I fully agree with this proposal and should be implemented ASAP. > > HOWEVER, I’ve a question regarding the impact analysis, and specially this > sentence: > > “To increase efficiency, this process will use an automated solution that > will allow the validation of “abuse-mailbox:” attributes without sending an > email. No action will be needed by resource holders that have configured > their “abuse-mailbox:” attribute correctly.” > > Reading the policy proposal, how the NCC concludes that it should be > “without sending an email”? > > I will say that the right way to do a validation (at creation/modification > and yearly) is, in a way that makes sense (having an email that nobody is > processing is exactly the same as not having the abuse attribute at all): > 1) Send an email with a link that must be clicked by a human (so some kind > of captcha-like mechanism should be followed) > 2) If this link is not clicked in a period of 48 hours (not including > Saturday-Sunday), an alarm should be generated so the NCC can take the > relevant actions and make sure that the mailbox is actively monitored by > the LIR > > Regards, > Jordi > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: policy-announce <policy-announce-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Marco > Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> > Fecha: jueves, 18 de enero de 2018, 12:23 > Para: <policy-announce at ripe.net> > Asunto: [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation) > > > > > > > > Dear colleagues, > > Policy proposal 2017-02, "Regular abuse-c Validation" is now in > the Review Phase. > > The goal of this proposal is to give the RIPE NCC a mandate to > regularly validate "abuse-c:" information and to follow up in > cases where the attribute is deemed to be incorrect. > > This proposal has been updated following the last round of > discussion and is now at version v2.0. Some of the differences > from version v1.0 include: > - A focus on validating the "abuse-mailbox:" attribute and fixing > incorrect contact information > - Added references to RIPE Policies and RIPE NCC procedures > > The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this latest > proposal version to support the community’s discussion. You can > find the full proposal and impact analysis at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2017-02 > > And the draft documents at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/ > proposals/2017-02/draft > > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of > this four-week Review Phase is to continue discussing the > proposal, taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to > review the full draft policy document. > > At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine > whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore > important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a > restatement of your input from the previous phase. > > We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft > document, and share your comments on <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> > <mailto:anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> > before 16 February 2018. > > Kind regards, > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > > > > > > > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.consulintel.es > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of > the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or > use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this > communication and delete it. > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20180119/cfe5af83/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]