[anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02: what does it achieve?

On 2017-09-25 18:33, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
> Yes, I get that it will trigger on that.
>
> What I'm struggling with (I don't want to speak for Nick), is this: what
> is the benefit of getting people to set it to a valid address that no
> human reads, or no human capable of acting, over null or the various
> null-equivalents you list?
>
> Who does that help? How?

I want to second this question in light of the proposal from Malcolm on
2017-09-25 16:02 CEST to enact a different form of monitoring by the
NCC, namely "a simple visualisation tool for the BGP
routing table."

It would be interesting to hear what are the pros and cons of this
proposal, and opinions of the group with respect to the efficacy of such
a measure given Europol's likely priorities.

best regards,

Amelia