[anti-abuse-wg] Language on List
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Language on List
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Language on List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Tue Jan 31 10:21:37 CET 2017
Morning, On 31/01/2017 09:08, ox wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:53:07 +0000 > Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: >> Colleagues, >> While the Anti-Abuse WG welcomes a free exchange of ideas and >> opinions, it does not welcome personal abuse of any kind. >> This includes, but is absolutely not limited to, their ethnicity or >> religion. >> Please remember this as we all continue to work together to make the >> Internet a better place. >> > I note the thread you created is: Language on List, but your post > contains no specifics about the Subject used? > > Maybe if you spoke more plainly and openly and said what you mean to > say without the UN type diplomacy, where one has to spend too much time > to analize a single sentence and create ten different scenarios based > on projections and probabilities of what was meant or intended? I shall be more clear, in that case. I have little or no problem with generalised swearing. It's a part of modern language and while I generally would not use it in professional written communications myself, I'm not going to attempt to censor anyone else for it. What I do not believe is acceptable is ad hominem attacks. There were what I believe were implied anti-Semetic comments made during the recent thread and that is not something that is allowed. Simple as that. Brian Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Language on List
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Language on List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]