[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c implementation
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 62, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RBL policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Jan 16 17:29:08 CET 2017
Colleagues We have started a discussion on the Database Working Group mailing list about resolving the issues with the "abuse-c:" implementation. We are currently identifying the issues and finalising the problem statement. If you would like to join this discussion it would help if you can do so on the DB WG mailing list, then it is all kept in one place. You can find the start of this discussion here:https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2017-January/005492.html cheersdenisco-chair DB-WG -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20170116/2dfdd9c4/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 62, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RBL policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]