[anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Sun Jan 8 05:01:55 CET 2017
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:30:02 +0000 Richard Clayton <richard at highwayman.com> wrote: > In message , ox <andre at ox.co.za> writes > >The people that are actively using RPZ to "protect" their users are > >finding that it is a piss poor method and that their users are as > >compromized as any other non RPZ user pool. > > that's a testable hypothesis -- what evidence do you have for it ? > Hindsight is always perfect. SpamCop is a DNS blocklist (which by the way IS and Ethical Anti Abuse Tool) it is reactive (after it has happened) abuse reporting system, with statistics. https://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=map Anyone can compare the abuse range volumes with that of a provider they know to be using PRZ I am not at liberty to discuss my own knowledge and personal experience in terms of specific companies. Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]