[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 62, Issue 5

Marilson,

On Jan 4, 2017, at 5:24 AM, Marilson <marilson.mapa at gmail.com> wrote:
> But Andre, he is doing what he is paid to do - to defend what he has created.

Sorry, this discussion has nothing to do what "what I'm paid to do" and I had no role whatsoever in the development of RPZ (I left ISC long before Paul and Vernon hacked BIND to support it). I don't even like it all that much. However, given RPZ solves a particular need and that multiple vendors are implementing it, I'd prefer they do so in an interoperable way rather than everybody doing their own thing in incompatible ways. I would have hoped we (folks who develop Internet technologies) learned our lesson from NAT (hey, isn't that "lying"?).

Regards,
-drc
(speaking only for myself)



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20170104/317130d1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20170104/317130d1/attachment.sig>