[anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Fri Feb 17 17:59:03 CET 2017
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 04:45:54PM +0000, Brian Nisbet wrote: >We are not here to talk about other instances. This is about one >instance. There does need to be further conversation about the >AA-WG community and the list. Agree. >There is quite a lot of material that did not make it to the >list because of the good offices of the NCC. Tobias and I asked >them to take interim moderation measures. The question after >that was to accept all mails or put in a ban, due to the >continued issues we went for a ban. That is not what I call the spirit of openness and transparency. In fact, "based on seekrit information we have and you don't" is pretty much the antithesis of that. >Ridiculing and criticising are two very, very different things. Criticising by ridiculing is in fact its very own art form - satire, particularly political satire. Punishing and/or censoring that is an attribute of a community or society that I do not very much care to live in (again!). >We have never suggested that founded and well argued criticism >shouldn't be allowed. Repeated offensive behaviour is very >different. Something that is, alas, pretty much a feature of the entire list. rgds, Sascha Luck > >Brian Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]