[anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Fri Feb 17 17:38:09 CET 2017
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 04:19:15PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: >There is a fine line between "freedom of speech" and "violating >the freedom of others". An argument used exclusively by wannabe censors over the centuries. I consider it discredited. >Anyone should be free to state their opinions. Correct >As should anyone be free to *not listen*. Correct But, and therein lies your fallacy: Nobody has the right to force others not to listen. >Nobody has the right to personally attack others - or force >others to listen to his droning on, by filling their listening >channels. This is not comparable. You cannot always avoid listening to "noise", but anyone is capable of *not* reading those posts, as I have not done until "forced" to by having to look for non-existant evidence of some accusations made. In fact I don't read the great majority of posts on the list. As I am free to do. >This list is like a private club. Yes, anyone can state their >opinion, but if they start to annoy the other patrons, the >landlord is free to ask them to state their opinion elsewhere. Since I own part of this club, I *am* one of the landlords and my opinion, let alone permission, was not asked. Maybe it's time to fire the bouncer. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]