[anti-abuse-wg] ASN effect on abuse

• Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Call For Agenda Items - AA-WG RIPE 75
• Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS41609, AS203974, and Alexandru ("Andrei") Stanciu / Suceava, Romania

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

alireza vaziri alireza.vaziri at gmail.com
Thu Aug 3 17:38:38 CEST 2017

Dear colleagues,

I
​ ​
have seen that some operators in EU have different ASN for their services,
one for transit, another for their subscribers and one for their datacenter
services.

As long as some of the spam protection services treat ASNs differently, is
there any relation between having different ASN and protecting their
infrastructure's ASN to show up in lists like this:
https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/botnet-asn/
​

​As a network/security administrator, do you drop/inspect/throttle
connection based on ASN?

Regards,
Alireza Vaziri​
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20170803/c6304802/attachment.html>

• Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Call For Agenda Items - AA-WG RIPE 75
• Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS41609, AS203974, and Alexandru ("Andrei") Stanciu / Suceava, Romania

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ anti-abuse-wg Archives ]