[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 59, Issue 7
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 59, Issue 7
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 59, Issue 7
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Tue Sep 6 08:21:42 CEST 2016
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 07:08:05 +0100 Richard Clayton <richard at highwayman.com> wrote: > >"The non sanctioned use of a resource to infringe upon the usage > >rights of another resource" > > > >(1) Resource > >Any Internet Resource > > that's a recursive definition -- which doesn't assist much > Okay, how can it be improved? All Internet resources? > >(4) Sanctioned > >An action, event or situation originating from the authoritative > >holder of rights to a resource that gives permission, or permission > >is granted by direct implication, which authorises that situation, > >event or action. > > excellent, the negation has disappeared > Yeah, but now it does not cater for orphan resources Remember that; If a resource is used with permission to abuse another resource = abuse So, the negation exists to allow the abuse to the resource (itself) by it's 'upstream' Which is why sanctioned - now works... (in the new order - after infringement...) (4) Infringe An action, event or situation which limits, reduces, undermines or encroaches upon the fair use of a resource (5) Sanctioned Infringement upon the use of a resource by the assignor or administrative holder of rights to a resource Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 59, Issue 7
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 59, Issue 7
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]