[anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 Discussion Period Extended Until 21 June 2016 (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 Discussion Period Extended Until 21 June 2016 (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 Discussion Period Extended Until 21 June 2016 (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Sat May 28 06:41:08 CEST 2016
On 26 May 2016, at 10:15, Gilles Massen wrote: > […] a community that has been granted > extensive exemptions from RIPE policies […] With respect, I have to disagree with this characterization of the situation. Holders of legacy resources have not been _granted_ any exemption from RIPE policies. They simply _are_ exempt from these policies, because they hold resources which are unconstrained by any agreement of the kind which the RIPE NCC rightly requires for resources which it has allocated or assigned. A proposal, such as this one, which depends on authority or power which the RIPE NCC has never had, is moot. Best regards, Niall O’Reilly
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 Discussion Period Extended Until 21 June 2016 (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 Discussion Period Extended Until 21 June 2016 (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]