[anti-abuse-wg] Fw: [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

There is a difference and I think, as has been pointed out, that the
discussion is veering a little too much into ad hominem.

So please, everyone, as always, robust discussion, but please discuss
the topic, not people.

Thanks all.

Brian

Brian Nisbet, Network Operations Manager
HEAnet Limited, Ireland's Education and Research Network
1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin 1
Registered in Ireland, no 275301  tel: +35316609040  fax: +35316603666
web: http://www.heanet.ie/

On 11/03/2016 16:10, ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> Sorry I hit reply instead of reply-all...
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> *From:* "ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk" <ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk>
> *To:* Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>
> *Sent:* Friday, 11 March 2016, 17:06
> *Subject:* Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal
> 2016-01
> 
> Hi Sander
> 
> I was not making any decision just expressing an opinion just as Elvis
> expressed his opinion on my implementation :)
> 
> cheers
> denis
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>
> *To:* denis <ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk>
> *Cc:* Database WG <db-wg at ripe.net>; "anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net"
> <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>
> *Sent:* Friday, 11 March 2016, 16:54
> *Subject:* Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal
> 2016-01
> 
> Hello Denis,
> 
> 
>> Sorry Elvis but you are neither a software engineer nor a regular user
> inputting data into the RIPE Database. So your unsubstantiated statement
> of 'poor' does not carry much weight.
> 
> 
> Excuse me, but you do not get to decide that a fellow working group
> member's contribution does not carry much weight. That is the working
> group chairs' job when deciding on consensus, and from experience I know
> that even the chairs only do that in very rare circumstances. Consensus
> is based on content and supporting arguments, not on whether you judge
> somebody worthy...
> 
> Cheers,
> Sander
> 
> 
> 
> 
>