[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Mar 7 21:01:37 CET 2016
> It has been implemented for the whole of the address space allocated > or assigned by the RIPE NCC. We spent 6 months 'encouraging' members > to deploy it, then another year 'encouraging' PI holders to deploy > it. ... and 42% of those addresses black-hole or bounce. and we keep tilting at this windmill. > The legacy resources are the only resources in the RIPE Database that > currently do not all have an abuse-c. If you use the tools provided by > the NCC you should not need to do any manual lookups or read comments. and the black-hole and bounce fraction will be higher. wake up and smell the coffee. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]