[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Mar 7 20:38:36 CET 2016
Hi Suresh On 07/03/2016 13:19, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > >> On 07-Mar-2016, at 5:44 PM, Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> >> wrote: >> >> I think Peter Koch, Gert Doering, and Gilles Massen have answered >> this question adequately already. > > Gert followed a rather socratic method - answering a question with > another :) > > The current method is absolutely not useful in that the lack of > standardization means people (including me) who are stuck with large > amounts of phish to report have no other alternative but do a > substantial part of the process manually. As I said in previous replies, abuse-c is standardised and is fully deployed for RIPE NCC resources. You should not need to do any manual lookups. cheers denis > > —srs > > Quoting Gert - > >> The relevant question for the PDP is "does 2016-01 help achieve the >> goal of better combatting Internet abuse"? >> >> [..] >>> I don't know why we are making the policy side so complicated. >>> The principle is simple. If you manage IP addresses in the public >>> domain, from where abuse can be generated, responsible management >>> requires you to provide abuse contact details!!! >> >> Will making "providing a mail address in a specific field" >> mandatory for people the RIPE NCC doesn't currently have a contract >> with (and that do not particularily frequently show up on the "evil >> boys list") help achieve your goals? Why?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]