[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 06:06:04PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On 07-Mar-2016, at 6:03 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> > 
> > - permit abuse-c: in inet(6)num: objects
> > - permit abuse-c: to point to a normal person: object, not only role:
> 
> [???]
> 
> I???m actually +1 with these.  And in fact even with the current spec there isn???t anything that says a person object can???t be abuse-c - though an outfit of any significant size might prefer to add a role account just so that multiple people can receive and handle abuse complaints.

Yeah, for our LIR abuse contact, this totally makes sense - there is a 
department handling this (SPCA-RIPE), so the *option* of having a role: 
here is good.

OTOH for my personal PI /24, the only abuse-c: ever will be me personally,
so not being able to reference my person: object but having to create
a role: for myself is a bit silly.

gert
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160307/a7abe5b9/attachment.sig>