[anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Mon Mar 7 10:08:47 CET 2016
On 05/03/2016 11:34, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 10:54:45AM +0000, Michele Neylon - Blacknight > wrote: >> Considering the IPv4 space is such a valuable resource now >> I’d happily argue that if you do a bad job of managing it >> then maybe you shouldn’t have it > > You should not forget to add the "and instead I should have it" > at the end. Besides, this discussion is about ERX resources which the NCC > CANNOT take away from their holders, which fact all the screaming > and bickering cannot change. > > Overall, this entire thread is proof of my point that this wg > should not make policy. I may have missed the logic behind this. Any RIPE WG can make policy, why should AA-WG be any different? Brian Brian Nisbet, Network Operations Manager HEAnet Limited, Ireland's Education and Research Network 1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin 1 Registered in Ireland, no 275301 tel: +35316609040 fax: +35316603666 web: http://www.heanet.ie/
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]