[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Mar 3 11:35:49 CET 2016
>> it would be a convenience to me for you to send me €1000/mo, and i am >> sure many other sould line up. let's make it mandatory. > > can we agree to leave the straw men out of this discussion? They're > not helping. no. even you seem to confuse what is necessary for the ncc to maintain a rigorously correct resource allocation registry and what is convenient for operators. i understamd the former being mandatory. while i occasionally find a good abuse-c: useful, it is not my prerogative to mandate that another operator have one for my convenience. the ncc's job is a rigorous registry, not a convenience store for ops. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]