[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
andre at ox.co.za
andre at ox.co.za
Thu Mar 3 11:23:59 CET 2016
On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:10:06 +0900 Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > >> really? and how does abuse-c affect the effective operation of the > >> ncc resource registry. > > it makes iet easier for the ncc to know who deals with abuse issues > > which includes, but is not limited to: law enforcement (kiddie porn, > > etc etc), the sync of warrants for courts and a few others > they use the real contact information for real contact > i guess it's a different world down there in za > randy I may be in za physically, but the infrastructure of my current employers are in EU, anyway, as you said already it is a convenience for ops to have abuse-c but the point is that it is actually convenient for a whole lot of others (incl me) If your abuse = your person - then you may as well add that person role to abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]