[anti-abuse-wg] simple routing question
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] simple routing question
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] simple routing question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Clayton
richard at highwayman.com
Sat Jun 11 03:41:21 CEST 2016
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <8078.1465592669 at server1.tristatelogic.com>, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> writes >Could one or more people here please answer the following simple >question for me? (I've already checked myself but my sources of >information are giving contradictory results/answers.) Although you often see the same result from two different vantage points it is regularly the case that you do not, especially when something wicked is going on. >The question is just this: > >Which (if any) routes within 161.123.0.0/16 are currently being announced >by AS60117? I see AS60117 to be behind AS43350, and they are announcing 161.123.48.0/22 161.123.52.0/22 161.123.56.0/22 161.123.64.0/18 161.123.128.0/18 161.123.192.0/18 Why do you actually ask ? - -- richard Richard Clayton Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBV1tsQTu8z1Kouez7EQIOuwCgjG3YBLNMOjhvMEB+J/k6fNeG7YYAoOdV rqHEJvD1yM1u3LlxXC7YaqTV =+BFD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] simple routing question
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] simple routing question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]