[anti-abuse-wg] AS201133
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS201133
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS201133
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sergey
gforgx at fotontel.ru
Fri Jul 1 14:47:41 CEST 2016
You're kind of like blind now. It's because they evade taxes. No other reason. On 07/01/16 15:12, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jun 30, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: > >> And conversely, why did RIPE, and/or any of its LIRs, deem it appropriate >> to grant one of RIPE's limited supply of AS numbers to a self-identified >> *Belizian* company, particularly when this was the company's first, >> last, and *only* AS number? > Because, as you pointed out, they have a network presence in the RIPE > region. > >> Wouldn't a LACNIC-issued AS number have >> done just as well? If not, why not? > I am not familiar with LACNIC policies. > -- Kind regards, CTO at *Foton Telecom CJSC* Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99 AS42861 on PeeringDB <http://as42861.peeringdb.com/>, Qrator <https://radar.qrator.net/as42861>, BGP.HE.NET <http://bgp.he.net/AS42861> http://ipv6actnow.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160701/5046da21/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS201133
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS201133
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]