[anti-abuse-wg] Malware/ransomware current live distribution IPs
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Malware/ransomware current live distribution IPs
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS201133
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
andre at ox.co.za
andre at ox.co.za
Fri Jul 1 06:54:32 CEST 2016
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 06:47:16 +0200 <andre at ox.co.za> wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jul 2016 10:07:46 +0530 > Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01/07/16, 10:02 AM, "anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of > > andre at ox.co.za" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of > > andre at ox.co.za> wrote: > > > Client host [hostacc.com] blocked using black.uribl.com; 127.0.0.1 > > > -> this "bounce" does not tell the sender how to delist from > > > "black.uribl.com" etc. > > I am not sure why a URL in the 5xx error is not an acceptable > > substitute for, say, a blog post or a longform New Yorker style > > essay on who URIBL are, why they’re blocking what’s probably your > > webhost etc. > nice is dnsbl.ascams.com - but although 100% accuracy it is > only a fresh spam list - this is also what the node messages look like > if you were to get your own dnsbl or dnsbl from dumpspam.com > > have a look at the bounce message & web link > dig TXT @dnsbl.ascams.com 247.241.106.184.dnsbl.ascams.com > *urgh* one of the dnsbl above whould of course be dnswl :( then, I realised that not everyone may have BSD or Linux here is an example bounce: ;; ANSWER SECTION: 247.241.106.184.dnsbl.ascams.com. 10800 IN TXT "184.106.241.247 Sending Spam. Listed in SPAM DNSBL see: https://dnsbl.ascams.com/?c=3094016503" Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Malware/ransomware current live distribution IPs
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS201133
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]