[anti-abuse-wg] Updated Document: Abuse Contact Data Sets
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Updated Document: Abuse Contact Data Sets
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Updated Document: Abuse Contact Data Sets
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michele Neylon - Blacknight
michele at blacknight.com
Thu Jan 21 12:05:21 CET 2016
Brian Thanks for sharing this A couple of notes: - there seems to be an assumption that “quality” and “responsiveness” are somehow linked. - the flow for ccTLD domain lookups seems to jump from the IANA DB directly to the CERT, which seems like overkill. The whois data *might* provide contact information that would be useful or failing that the hostname lookup would give the hosting provider / ISP. (or maybe I’ve misread the chart?) Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 On 20/01/2016, 16:22, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Brian Nisbet" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: >Colleagues, > >The group working on this document (L. Aaron Kaplan, Mirjam Kühne, >Christian Teuschel) have produced a new draft. This draft contains a >number of updates, based on feedback from the community. > >The main changes are: > >- clarified terminology such as abuse handler, security incident, >registrant, national CERT, etc. >- clarified problem statement >- removed specific mentioning of name-based services in the problem >statement >- used "European" examples >- added API details for Nation CSIRT DB >- elaborated on conclusion and next steps > >This document was sent to me earlier in the week, but for various >reasons I didn't manage to forward it on to you all until now. With the >TF-CSIRT meeting happening next week it would be great if we could >gather any further feedback before the end of this week, but I realise >that is quite a short term period, for which I apologise. So I'm not >proposing a hard cut-off by end of day on Friday, but I think it would >be extremely useful if people could try to post to the list before then. > >This would hopefully allow the authors to go to the TF-CSIRT meeting >with a very nearly final draft and then complete it shortly afterwards. > >Certainly I would propose no more than a working week to receive other >feedback, so we'd be looking at the end of Wednesday 27th. > >Thanks, > >Brian >Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Updated Document: Abuse Contact Data Sets
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Updated Document: Abuse Contact Data Sets
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]