[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Sat Aug 27 16:42:57 CEST 2016
On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:16:09 +0200 > "Marilson" <marilson.mapa at gmail.com> wrote: > > If a computer was infected for sending spam or malicious files, it > > was stolen. After all we are talking about Internet, right? Are you > > talking about what? Home invasion? Theft of objects? > Just read what you, yourself are typing above: > "If a computer was infected" - this means that: > Someone or something did something > Someone or Something (or a program or whatever) DID infect > So, the definition of Internet Abuse, As I have stated it - Works > perfectly fine. > Maybe If you read the definition again, it can help you? > > "The non sanctioned use of a resource to infringe upon the usage > rights of another resource" > > This means: Someone (or something) USED you resource (Your PC) > to send spam or do something or use it for... > Just in case someone technical now wants to tell me that a "pc" is not an Internet Resource, PLEASE note: I am simply making it VERY simple so that Marilson can understand it also... In the example - the internet resource would of course NOT be Marilson's PC - BUT his PC's resource (IP number, etc) or the resource that Marilson's PC uses, on the Internet, - to abuse ANOTHER resource... Just to be technically clear :) And then, there is still no real world example of a single resource abuse. So, I guess that means that the definition still holds up... Andre > See? > > - If someone steals your PC or breaks into your home to steal your pc > It is NOT Internet Abuse... > > If they break in and USE your PC to send spam - Then of course it is > Internet Abuse - and the definition holds up. > > BUT > > You are changing the point... You were siding with Gunther, and what > Gunther said was: > > a Single resource can do Internet Abuse... > > You are involving multiple resources and then claiming that it > addresses the first problem... > > Not cool, so either you are arguing for the simple sake of arguing or > you do not understand the problem. > > Which is it? > > Andre >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]