[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Thu Aug 25 15:36:14 CEST 2016
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:28:58 +0200 Gunther Nitzsche <gnitzsche at netcologne.de> wrote: > On 08/25/2016 02:38 PM, ox wrote: > > Hello Gunther, > > Okay, I have read through your reply and it seems you do not > > understand that a single resource is not a network. > > Internet Abuse - Needs two resources - otherwise it is not a network > > and by default - not Internet Abuse. > > If you are on my server: > > unauthorized - is abuse > > authorized - is not abuse > > If you use my server to do something to another resource... > > Get it yet? > > > No. Sorry. :-( okay, I will try to explain it better :) In English, abuse is an action on something by something there are always two things. For example If you abuse your donkey ( --> = abuse ) You --> Donkey Normal bitcoin mining abuse = You --> CPU Anyway, Internet abuse same principle One resource --> another resource Get it now? > "If you use my server to do something. " Stop. > I do not need "another resource". I wonder what arguments > you have against my suggestion of wording. > > I even doubt that the anti-abuse-working-group is limited to > network based abuse. Entering wrong registration data (let's say by > FAX) could also be covered by this group though it is not a network > based abuse. > wrong registration data by fax - is not Internet abuse (doubtful if it even normal or just abuse...) > No artificial restrictions please; they might hurt us later on. > > best greetings, > > Gunther > > NetCologne Systemadministration
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]