[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Transparency of terminated RIPE NCC memberships (was RIPE Charter)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Tue Aug 23 01:12:48 CEST 2016
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 01:16:47PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >More to the point however, although RIPE NCC may indeed wish, as >a matter of policy, to refrain from disclosing "non-public >information", any such policy is obviously, demonstratably, and >utterly irrelevant to the request I have made. Your request is off-topic for this WG. The NCC is content-agnostic and "internet abuse" is not a reason to terminate a contract and close a LIR. It also concerns a contractual issue between the RIPE NCC and the member(s) in question. This is not the business of the RIPE community or any WG (other than, perhaps, ncc-services) The NCC has, in the spirit of helpfulness, shown you some courtesy in providing certain information - a courtesy that, given your continued attempts to paint it as either hapless idiots or a den of thieves, you don't deserve. Even the request for numbers of closures as well as the answer given were strictly-speaking off-topic for this WG. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Transparency of terminated RIPE NCC memberships (was RIPE Charter)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]