[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Thu Aug 18 09:59:16 CEST 2016
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:34:25 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: > >It is important to mention though, that the resource would have had > >to be used though, for there to have been abuse in the first place. > > Defined "use". > > If I announce a route to an IP block, e.g. one that isn't actually > assigned to me, but then I never put anything in that block, have I > "used" it? > > Some what say "yes". Others would say "no". > Okay, just to be clear and precise: You agree that the definition of abuse is: "The non sanctioned use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights of another resource" As you are now discussing what "use" means - so using a resource obtained by fraudulent methods / fake information - you are happy with just the actual act of obtaining a resource is not abuse? Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]