[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Wed Aug 17 20:58:38 CEST 2016
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:47:09 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: > ox <andre at ox.co.za> wrote: > >So, to be clear - I am not saying that I THINK ripe should file > >criminal charges (THEY MUST) > > Well, OK, I did miscounstrue your comments, so for that I apologize. > thank you Ron. I also apologize for being overly aggressive in my reply > But for all the reasons I've already noted, RIPE NCC actually DO NOT > do what you think "THEY MUST". They do not call in the police each > time some clever forger flim-flams them. > Yes, I agree. they do not currently - but, being a public organization, they have additional obligations to file criminal complaints when the organization is a victim of a crime ( as well as all the other things I have already said) > If you think you can change that, by all means, you're free to try. > But for all the reasons I've already noted, I do not think that will > change, nor do I think it should. > > I would really rather that law enforcement spend their limited time > and resources chasing down terrorists, bank robbers, child molesters, > child pornographers, and all such other scum-of-the-earth as deserve > their special attention. > > > Regards, > rfg >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]