[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Wed Aug 17 13:46:19 CEST 2016
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:50:56 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: > ox <andre at ox.co.za> wrote: > >When anyone commits fraud to obtain a resource from RIPE, RIPE has > >the responsibility to file criminal charges against that criminal. > > > >I am not saying that I think RIPE should file criminal charges... > > I would suggest that you consider running for President of the United > States, but we've already got another guy in the race who routinely > manages to contradict himself within the space of two consecutive > sentences. > I am not sure why you would do what you are doing, but you "conveniently" remove the following sentences from the same post: "I am saying that not doing so is in itself a questionable action." So, to be clear - I am not saying that I THINK ripe should file criminal charges (THEY MUST) I am also saying NOT doing that is a questionable action. Nit picking much Ron? Why do you not contribute to the post and rather ask for an explanation than telling me that I am contradicting myself when clearly you did not read what I typed? Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]