[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Aug 17 11:08:09 CEST 2016
I think the term that's being collectively groped for is whether ripe ncc has a reporting obligation in case it discovers criminal activity The number of cases where such reporting is mandatory in law and not simply a matter of good citizenship is rather limited - threat to life, kidnap, etc. --srs On 17-Aug-2016, at 2:26 PM, Rob Evans <rhe at nosc.ja.net> wrote: >> When anyone commits fraud to obtain a resource from RIPE, RIPE has the >> responsibility to file criminal charges against that criminal. >> >> I am not saying that I think RIPE should file criminal charges, I am >> saying that not doing so is in itself a questionable action. > > Well, to be pedantic, *criminal* charges are filed by the police > or other law-enforcment body, not by companies. :) > > Rob > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160817/d372c32c/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]