[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Wed Aug 10 22:27:45 CEST 2016
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:27:04PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >I'm still trying to understand. RIPE is *not* RIPE NCC and vise versa, >correct? I mean they are two different things, legally speaking, yes? >A person or legal entity could be a member of "RIPE" and yet not be a >member of "RIPE NCC", correct? Correct. Technically, every internet user is a member of the RIPE community. > Conversely, could a person or legal >entity be a member of "RIPE NCC" and yet _not_ be a member of "RIPE"? Only in theory, really. >Is it correct also that only those persons and legal entities that >are actually paying dues to RIPE NCC are members of RIPE NCC? Yes. Well, those who have a contract, but that involves a membership fee. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]