[anti-abuse-wg] Abusive behavior by Google Inc
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abusive behavior by Google Inc
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abusive behavior by Google Inc
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
andre at ox.co.za
andre at ox.co.za
Thu Apr 14 16:35:26 CEST 2016
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 19:51:27 +0530 Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > This isn't quite mailop but anyway - what specifically do you mean by > replace here? > Yes, but is is an abuse wok group - it is important that the group also discusses abuse, more so if their is abusive behavior from a huge multinational. > Do you strip mime parts that you consider spam or malware and replace > them with a suitable message? And is the gmail mta not reacting well > to that? > > Examples would be interesting - certainly much more interesting than > a vague rant. > Not a vague rant at all - the original post already contains the information. Gmail is behaving poorly/abusively. maybe you require me to add additional information? - as there is ZERO chance that you do not know what I am complaining about... I do wonder why you are not simply replying honestly and openly? ... Gmail customer sends email from Gmail to @ox.co.za ox.co.za responds: Listed at SORBS Currently sending SPAM! Gmail sends "improved" bounce report to Gmail customer: example: > Date: 14 April 2016 at 14:09:39 SAST > To: customer at gmail.com > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > andre at ox.co.za > > Technical details of permanent failure: > read error: generic::failed_precondition: read error (0): error > > ----- Original message ----- > > --srs > andre > > On 14-Apr-2016, at 7:17 PM, andre at ox.co.za wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Incase anyone receives weird NON RFC bounces, from @gmail.com > > customers saying: > > > > Technical details of permanent failure: > > read error: generic::failed_precondition: read error (0): error > > > > What this means is: > > > > Google Inc does REPLACE the "Blocked for abuse / spam /scams / > > phish / virus / spyware messages from the various filters > > > > and sens a cryptic non RFC message to their users implying that the > > receivers email server is broken in some way.... > > > > This is truly EVIL of Google to do... > > > > As they, Google are the ones sending PHISH / VIRUS/ SCAMS / SPAM! > > > > Example: @209.85.218.43 > > > > http://www.scammed.by/scam.php?id=185816 > > > > > > Instead of SOLVING the abuse - Google chooses to send CRYPTIC > > technical failure messages... > > > > Because they are a monopoly and they are simply just too large to > > care?? > > > > Yes, of course! > > > > Andre > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abusive behavior by Google Inc
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abusive behavior by Google Inc
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]