[anti-abuse-wg] Excuses

Marilson,

I'm not sure who warned you regarding your emails, but it certainly 
didn't come from the Co-Chairs of the WG.

We absolutely welcome discussions of network abuse on the list, just as 
we welcome ideas on how to improve things, including policy suggestions 
for the RIPE community. However the reality of the situation is that 
mails to this list will not suddenly cause the spam to stop. Neither the 
RIPE NCC nor the RIPE community (as an entity) has the power to do that.

The policy process is one of setting out what you want and then gaining 
consensus, that is the only way that things are changed in this community.

The WG Co-Chairs are available to help you with this process and to 
discuss what is possible.

Thanks,

Brian
Co-Chair, RIPE Anti-Abuse WG
On 29/09/2015 19:53, Marilson wrote:
> THE ANTI-ABUSE-WG ARCHIVES:
>
> In August 2015 the only discussion held was generated by a copy of my
> complaint addressed to an ISP - 13 messages
>
> In September 2015 the only discussion held was generated by a copy of my
> complaint addressed to an ISP - 42 messages
>
> Against the grain of these numbers I was politely warned that my
> messages to the list should certainly be blocked because I clearly do
> not understand what the list currently does.
>
> I was also warned that the list is not the place to make complaints and
> that I should look for spamcop in the Google search.
>
> I would like to clarify to the group that I always start my complaints
> in submit.snA38em0rJTkVJ7B at spam.spamcop.net, once finalized in spamcop I
> send the complaint to the ISP responsible for the spammer with copies to
> pertinent institutions. Andcopyto anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net.
>
> I copy for anti-abuse-wg at ripe.netbecause I have noticed that my
> complaints have generated much discussion in the group. I thought I was
> being helpful. Since I am doing the wrong thing, I apologize to the
> group members and retreat myself wishing a good job for everyone.
>
> Greetings
>
> Marilson
>