[anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!

On 28 Sep 2015, at 5:52, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:

> As a registrar of record for a domain name I only have the “nuclear 
> option”.

Same on the Registry side of things. I believe that ISPs/hosting 
providers should be the first to bat because most likely they are the 
closest to the resource that is being primarily used as an avenue for 
abuse. Then the Registrars and finally the Registries get their turn. As 
Suresh, I’ve been at this for more than a year or two and it’s 
depressingly frequent to watch ISPs and hosting companies do nothing.

Best regards

Luis Muñoz
Director, Registry Operations
____________________________

http://www.uniregistry.link/
2161 San Joaquin Hills Road
Newport Beach, CA 92660

Office +1 949 706 2300 x 4242
lem at uniregistry.link
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20150928/c04ea44c/attachment.html>