This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Two simple questions about WHOIS data
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 47, Issue 7
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Excuses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Tue Sep 29 08:06:59 CEST 2015
1) Within all of the domain WHOIS records that I have ever seen, there
are at least the following data fields:
Registrant name:
Registrant Address:
Registrant Phone#:
Registrant Fax#:
Which (if any) of these data fields is considered "optional" and
which (if any) are "required"?
2) In theory, at least, what is SUPPOSED to happen if, say, somebody
reports to ICANN that a domain name WHOIS records contains false
or fradulent information, and if, after that report has been sent
on the relevant registrar, and thence, presumably, also on the
the relevant domain registrant, and after a proper amount of time
for them to be allowed to act has passed, and if by then the domain
registrant has either refused to correct the WHOIS data or has put
in new and different data that the original reporter claims is also
false/fradulent, then, after this sequence of events, what exactly
is SUPPOSED to happen? Is the registrar then expected and/or required
to suspend the domain registration? Anything else? Is the registrar
also supposed to disable or hobble the registrant's own preferred
DNS service/servers for that domain? Anything else?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 47, Issue 7
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Excuses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]