[anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
andre at ox.co.za
andre at ox.co.za
Mon Sep 28 14:20:26 CEST 2015
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:52:25 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: <snip so many cool things here> > > "Privacy is a right in many jurisdictions". > Bullshit. > even when you are having a human shit, there are satellites that can see your thermal ass squatting and squeaking. > Criminals everywhere are very greatful to ICANN. > and to so many ISP's that ignore abuse or that hide behind an image of decency... Spam is not a domain thing, it is an IP thing. So why are we focused on domain names? a name is nothing, it cannot route, a number routes. all this focus on domains are doing is to obfuscate and FUD(dify) the real issue: ISP's should be responsible for their IP ranges (4 and 6) as an African, literally my 1c Andre <snip so many more cool things here>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]