[anti-abuse-wg] Lottery Master
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE 71 Agenda - First Draft
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 18
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
nainsel705 at btinternet.com
nainsel705 at btinternet.com
Sat Oct 17 18:20:39 CEST 2015
I keep adding Lottery Master to the blocked sender list but the emails keep arriving. Has anybody else encountered this problem? Nainsel. -----Original Message----- From: anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:00 AM To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net Subject: anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 16 Send anti-abuse-wg mailing list submissions to anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net You can reach the person managing the list at anti-abuse-wg-owner at ripe.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of anti-abuse-wg digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 10 (Brian Nisbet) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:38:54 +0100 From: Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 10 Message-ID: <561B7FAE.4090704 at heanet.ie> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Gentlemen, Thank you for the nomination and the answer. So noted. Brian Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG On 09/10/2015 21:49, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > In message <55BB79F4004C439393E855B0BC8065F6 at SuperPC>, > "Marilson" <marilson.mapa at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I would like to nominate a person for the second chair: meu amigo Ronald >> F. >> Guilmette (friend for one more day). > > While I appreciate this unexpected (and largely unearned) vote of > confidence, unfortunately I find it necessary to quote a man whose > actual accomplishments actually did warrant his consideration for > high office: > > "If nominated I will not run; if elected I will not serve." > -- William Tecumseh Sherman > > (I might actually be tempted to volunteer for the position is question, > but given that I am not physically present anywhere within the RIPE > geographical region, I feel sure that even if relevant bylaws permitted > it, I would be committing a serious disservice to the entire WG if I > were to make any pretense of fulfilling the role in question, e.g. by > merely "phoning it in", so to speak.) > > > Regards, > rfg > > > P.S. Thanks largely to absoluely everybody on this mailing list, I was > compelled to do the research and to find my own answers to the two key > questions that I posted here the other day. The clear implications of > what I found (in the ICANN 2013 RAA) are, I would say, worse than > disturbing, > about which I will have more to say later on. > > What I found does raise one other question however... which I will post > here now in the complete expectation of the exact same level of helpful > responsiveness which you all accorded to my last two questions: > > When the exact wording of the 21013 RAA was being negotiated... by > ICANN, sitting across the table from such other "stakeholders" as the > Registrars Committee... who exactly was the lead negotiator for ICANN's > side of the table? > End of anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 16 *********************************************
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE 71 Agenda - First Draft
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 18
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]