[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 10
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Anti spam gateway
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Mon Oct 12 11:38:54 CEST 2015
Gentlemen, Thank you for the nomination and the answer. So noted. Brian Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG On 09/10/2015 21:49, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > In message <55BB79F4004C439393E855B0BC8065F6 at SuperPC>, > "Marilson" <marilson.mapa at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I would like to nominate a person for the second chair: meu amigo Ronald F. >> Guilmette (friend for one more day). > > While I appreciate this unexpected (and largely unearned) vote of > confidence, unfortunately I find it necessary to quote a man whose > actual accomplishments actually did warrant his consideration for > high office: > > "If nominated I will not run; if elected I will not serve." > -- William Tecumseh Sherman > > (I might actually be tempted to volunteer for the position is question, > but given that I am not physically present anywhere within the RIPE > geographical region, I feel sure that even if relevant bylaws permitted > it, I would be committing a serious disservice to the entire WG if I > were to make any pretense of fulfilling the role in question, e.g. by > merely "phoning it in", so to speak.) > > > Regards, > rfg > > > P.S. Thanks largely to absoluely everybody on this mailing list, I was > compelled to do the research and to find my own answers to the two key > questions that I posted here the other day. The clear implications of > what I found (in the ICANN 2013 RAA) are, I would say, worse than disturbing, > about which I will have more to say later on. > > What I found does raise one other question however... which I will post > here now in the complete expectation of the exact same level of helpful > responsiveness which you all accorded to my last two questions: > > When the exact wording of the 21013 RAA was being negotiated... by > ICANN, sitting across the table from such other "stakeholders" as the > Registrars Committee... who exactly was the lead negotiator for ICANN's > side of the table? >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Anti spam gateway
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]