[anti-abuse-wg] Sources of Abuse Contact Info For Abuse Handlers
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Sources of Abuse Contact Info For Abuse Handlers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Sources of Abuse Contact Info For Abuse Handlers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
L. Aaron Kaplan
kaplan at cert.at
Tue Nov 17 16:01:47 CET 2015
> On 17 Nov 2015, at 15:45, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > > A domain may expire in a year and then be recycled - registered by someone else, usually a domainer. > > On the other hand if someone takes the trouble to get a prefix, an ASN, transit / peering and such I dare say he won’t give up the prefix all that easily (barring accidents such as going out of business) > > The bar is much higher because > > 1. Far fewer prefixes than domains, by orders of magnitude > +1 higher costs than for a domain :) Very simple > 2. A single prefix can have thousands of domains hosted on it - sort of aggregating things very conveniently, abuse handling wise. > > —srs > >> On 17-Nov-2015, at 7:09 PM, Gilles Massen <gilles.massen at restena.lu> wrote: >> >> - under point 4 it says implicitly that name-based whois is quicker >> outdated than number-based whois. Is there any hard data to back that >> statement up? > > -- // CERT Austria // L. Aaron Kaplan <kaplan at cert.at> // T: +43 1 505 64 16 78 // http://www.cert.at // Eine Initiative der NIC.at Internet Verwaltungs- und Betriebs GmbH // http://www.nic.at/ - Firmenbuchnummer 172568b, LG Salzburg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Sources of Abuse Contact Info For Abuse Handlers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Sources of Abuse Contact Info For Abuse Handlers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]