[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] [routing-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:52:36PM +0100, denis wrote:
[..]
>  From what I understood from Gert and Randy's comments it is a user's 
> choice where to put a ROUTE object and there seem to be some reasons why 
> they sometimes choose to put it in the RIPE Database. 

"Document everything one AS originates in a single database" is the
primary motivation here (so upstreams/peers can go to a single source
to build filters, and that single source must not be RADB).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20151111/428965b5/attachment.sig>