[anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Fri Nov 6 23:44:53 CET 2015
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 11:38:52PM +0100, Sander Steffann wrote: > >But the RIPE NCC isn't an official party in that contract. The >contract is between end user and LIR. Well... Considering that such a contract must be submitted to, and approved by, the RIPE NCC (or it will not result in the assignment of resources); I'm of the opinion that a court might well see the NCC as a party. It has never been tested though (and neither has the NCC data protection policy) and my view doesn't seem to be shared by many... rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]